Showing posts with label Instructional Videos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Instructional Videos. Show all posts

Monday, January 17, 2011

If you're pining for more practice in between LDL meetings, here's an online debate from the NFL tournament that will show you what a national circuit debate can look like.

They are debating the topic from 2009:
(2008–2009) Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Coaches' Workshop - Debate Styles

Here's the Lane Debate League's take on the types of debate.


Megan Gaffney introduces Cross Examination Debate (AKA Policy / C-X)





Katie Bergus introduces Lincoln Douglas Debate



Rachel Mosley feat. Ben Dodds introduce Public (AKA Parliamentary) and Public Forum (AKA Ted Turner)


Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Coaches Workshop - Argument Structure and Judging Paradigms

Our lectures from the coaches workshop are slowly migrating their way online. Here's the first two. Sorry about the darkness - the next videos are in the light and are much easier to see.

Rachel Mosley discusses argument structure, responsiveness, "kicking arguments", and roadmaps.
Part 1 - 
Part 2 - 

Hank Fields discusses judge "Paradigms" and judge adaptation.
Paradigm Lecture Powerpoint

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Coaches' Workshop - Okinawa Practice Debate

Big thanks to everyone who made it to our workshop this weekend! As promised, here's Saturday's practice debate.
The times are shortened from normal policy: Constructives are about 5 minutes, CX is about 2 minutes, and Rebuttals are roughly 3 minutes.

1AC 

1AC CX

1NC

1NC CX

2AC

2AC CX

2NC

2NC CX

1NR

1AR

2NR

2AR

Addressing a few concerns people had after the debate:

Some were distressed by the speed of some of the speeches. Policy has a certain cadence to it that becomes much easier to hear after you give it a couple tries. Some tips: look at some policy debate evidence, individually known as "cards". The "tagline" or summary of evidence at the top of the argument is usually read more slowly and deliberately, and when flowing you should try to get this down and then listen to the rest of the argument instead of scrambling to get down every word. After listening to a couple debates, you should be able to recognize when a new card is starting. Most debaters will segway with a term like "NEXT," or "AND," to give people a chance to catch up. If you don't do this in debates, you're really selling yourself short, because the judge is just as likely to miss the thesis of your argument as your opponents.

Also, an observer commented that it sounds like we're being quite mean to each other in Cross-X. Keep in mind all the debaters involved are close friends who know each other quite well (Katie and Megan are partners IRL, for example). We're a competitive bunch, and enjoy challenging each other. This is not always the case; the observer rightly brings up the point that if you don't know your opponents well, you should always err on the side of being too courteous. A little bit of competitive jabbing is healthy, but you need to know that you have that relationship with your opponents ahead of time to avoid really alienating certain judges (and potential friends).

Finally, the resolution isn't high enough to read the flow behind us, but the link to the flow at the end of the round is posted here - Flowing Practice - see if yours looks similar!


Watch it, comment, and let us know what you think!!

More lectures from the workshop will be posted tonight.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

2010-11 Topic Intro Lecture

If you missed our first lecture and want a brief introduction to the 2010-11 High School Policy Resolution, here's what we went over.

A video of the lecture is here:


And here's the powerpoint for the presentation if you want to follow along, because it's a little hard to see.